- RWG
- Forums
- Members
-
- RWG Store
- Blogs
- Watchbox
- Upgrade
- Links
- Shoutbox
- Feedback
- Donate
- Forum Ca$h
- Upload
-
More
Review - Tag Heuer Aquaracer 500m
Started by b16a2, Feb 14 2010 05:31 PM
68 replies to this topic
#61 OFFLINE
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:37 PM
You will probably want to talk to Vacuum. He can do the things you ask, but to warn you ... if you remove the cyclops you may have to reapply the AR coating to the crystal as well.
#62 OFFLINE
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:51 PM
Thanks for the advise, but shipping costs wouldn't not worth it i guess, so i should find a local service...
Btw another shot.
Btw another shot.
Edited by kyle007, 27 February 2012 - 09:54 PM.
#63 OFFLINE
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:06 PM
If you tell us which Country, it would be easier to give you advice.
#64 OFFLINE
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:39 PM
Jkay, Turkey
#65 OFFLINE
Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:44 AM
i know, i'd rather it not have the cyclopes as well. but that's how the gen is so i guess there's not much option unless you want a pricey mod...
#66 OFFLINE
Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:42 PM
Man that is such a clean looking watch!! I think I am going to have to pick one up!!
#67 OFFLINE
Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:56 PM
vandal.tbh, on 28 February 2012 - 01:44 AM, said:
i know, i'd rather it not have the cyclopes as well. but that's how the gen is so i guess there's not much option unless you want a pricey mod...
Yeah i know, it'll cost me almost more than i paid for the watch, sapphire glass,AR etc... Hence i give up this idea.
Today my first full day with the watch. I really love the AR, consider the price it's great!
And for an A21J movement, i think 4sec. is just badass!
Btw here is a pic of the gen mod, removed cyclopes. It's way better IMHO...
Edited by kyle007, 28 February 2012 - 03:56 PM.
#68 OFFLINE
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:06 AM
So I could not stand looking at it anymore. No AR? Terrible lume? I sent it to Vac for the full treatment.
This is not a cheap watch, and the factory is not doing right by us on this piece.
This is not a cheap watch, and the factory is not doing right by us on this piece.
#69 OFFLINE
Posted 11 March 2012 - 07:14 AM
Wow, really nice watch. I think i will get one
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


